On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 11:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps I was too optimistic about adding support for newer instructions... > > I'm tempted to propose that we move forward with this patch as-is after > adding a buildfarm machine that compiles with -mavx2 or -march=x86-64-v3.
That means that we would be on the hook to fix it if it breaks, even though nothing uses it yet in a normal build. I have pending patches that will break, or get broken by, this, so minus-many from me until there is an availability story.
