Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 14:35, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> Various code comments say that the RangeTblEntry field inh may only be >> set for entries of kind RTE_RELATION.
> Yes, it's explained a bit more clearly/accurately in > expand_inherited_rtentry(): > * "inh" is only allowed in two cases: RELATION and SUBQUERY RTEs. Yes. The latter has been accurate for a very long time, so I'm surprised that there are any places that think otherwise. We need to fix them --- where did you see this exactly? (Note that RELATION-only is accurate within the parser and rewriter, so maybe clarifications about context are in order.) regards, tom lane