Hi, > > On 6 Mar 2024, at 18:49, Andrey M. Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > > > Here are statuses for "Refactoring" section: > > [...]
> Aleksander, I would greatly appreciate if you join me in managing CF. > Together we can move more stuff :) > Currently, I'm going through "SQL Commands". And so far I had not come to > "Performance" and "Server Features" at all... So if you can handle updating > statuses of that sections - that would be great. Server Features: * Fix partitionwise join with partially-redundant join clauses I see there is a good discussion in the progress here. Doesn't seem to be needing more reviewers at the moment. * ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD on partitioned tables Ditto. * Patch to implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types The patch doesn't apply and has been "Waiting on Author" for a few months now. Could be a candidate for closing with RwF. * logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 According to Tomas Vondra the patch is not ready for PG17. The patch is marked as "Waiting on Author". Although it could be withrowed for now, personally I see no problem with keeping it WoA until the PG18 cycle begins. * Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends v20231226 doesn't apply. The patch needs love from somebody interested in it. * Multi-version ICU By a quick look the patch doesn't apply and was moved between several commitfests, last time in "Waiting on Author" state. Could be a candidate for closing with RwF. * Post-special Page Storage TDE support A large patch divided into 28 (!) parts. Currently needs a rebase. Which shouldn't necessarily stop a reviewer looking for a challenging task. * Built-in collation provider for "C" and "C.UTF-8" Peter E left some feedback today, so I changed the status to "Waiting on Author" * ltree hash functions Marked as RfC and cfbot seems to be happy with the patch. Could use some attention from a committer? * UUID v7 The patch is in good shape. Michael argued that the patch should be merged when RFC is approved. No action seems to be needed until then. * (to be continued) -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev