On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:15 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: > > I can't see how refusing to free memory owned and controlled by someone > else, > > and throwing an error if attempted, wouldn't be a sound defensive > programming > > measure. > > I think the argument is about what "refusal" looks like. > An Assert seems OK to me, but anything based on elog is > likely to be problematic, because it'll involve exit() > somewhere. > > > Yeah, I agree an Assert seems safest here. I'd like to get this done ASAP so I can rebase my incremental parse patchset. Daniel, do you want to commit it? If not, I can. cheers andrew
