Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 23:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> After thinking a bit more, I understood what was bothering me about >> that notation: it looks too much like a call of a user-defined >> function named "rescan()". I think we'd be better off with the >> all-caps "RESCAN()".
> Or perhaps move the parentheses, and write "(rescan SubPlan N)" or > "(reset SubPlan N)". Dunno. Oh, I like that! It seems rather parallel to the existing "hashed" annotation. If I had it to do over, I'd likely do the "hashed" bit differently --- but as the proposal currently stands, we are not changing "hashed", so we might as well double down on that. I won't update the patch right now, but "(rescan SubPlan N)" seems like a winner to me. regards, tom lane