On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 7:48 PM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat....@gmail.com> wrote: > With the later code, semi_rhs_expr is indeed free'able. It wasn't so when I > wrote the patches. Thanks for updating the comment. I wish we would have > freeObject(). Nothing that can be done for this patch.
Yes. > Attached patches > Squashed your 0001 and 0002 into 0001. I have also reworded the commit > message to reflect the latest code changes. > 0002 has some minor edits. Please feel free to include or reject when > committing the patch. I've pushed this now. When updating the commit message, I realized that you had made the right call to divide the the changes around not translating the dummy SpecialJoinInfos into a separate patch. So, I pushed it like that. Thanks for working on this. -- Thanks, Amit Langote
