> On Mar 27, 2024, at 3:53 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> I am thinking "enable_alter_system_command" is probably good because we >> already use "enable" so why not reuse that idea, and I think "command" >> is needed because we need to clarify we are talking about the command, >> and not generic altering of the system. We could use >> "enable_sql_alter_system" if people want something shorter. > > Robert already mentioned why not use "enable_": up to now that prefix > has only been applied to planner plan-type-enabling GUCs. I'd be okay > with "allow_alter_system_command", although I find it unnecessarily > verbose. Agree. I don’t think “_command” adds much clarity. Cheers Andrew
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Jelte Fennema-Nio
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Robert Haas
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Daniel Gustafsson
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Robert Haas
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Tom Lane
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Tom Lane
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Jelte Fennema-Nio
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Robert Haas
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Jelte Fennema-Nio
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Jelte Fennema-Nio
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Bruce Momjian
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Jelte Fennema-Nio
- Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` Robert Haas