Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:53:51AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 10:20 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > Also, is there a chance this is going to be back-patched? I guess it > > would be enough if the ugprade target is v17 so it is less of a concern, > > but it would be nice if people with millions of large objects are not > > stuck until they are ready to ugprade to v17. > > It is a quite invasive patch, and it adds new features (pg_restore in > bigger transaction patches), so I think this is not for backpatching, > desirable as it may seem from the usability angle.
Right, I forgot about those changes, makes sense. Michael
