On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 08:56:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > There is pg_read_all_stats as well, so I don't see a big issue in > requiring to be a member of this role as well for the sake of what's > proposing here.
Well, that tells you quite a bit more than just which PIDs correspond to autovacuum workers, but maybe that's good enough for now. > I'd rather not leak any information at the end for > anybody calling pg_signal_backend without access to the stats, so > checking the backend type after the role sounds kind of a safer > long-term approach for me. I'm not following what you mean by this. Are you suggesting that we should keep the existing superuser message for the autovacuum workers? -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
