On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 12:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Wouldn't the best way forward be to revert > 5bec1d6bc5e3 and revisit the whole in v18?
That's a reasonable conclusion. Also consider commits b840508644 and bcb14f4abc. I had tried to come up with a narrower fix, and I think it's already been implemented here in approach 2: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAtf12e9Z9NLBuaO1GjHMMo16_8R-yBu9Q9jrk2QLqMEA%40mail.gmail.com but it does feel wrong to introduce an unnecessary hash table in 17 when we know it's not the right solution. Regards, Jeff Davis
