On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 3:31 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > That would be a reasonable answer if we deem the problem to be > just "the buildfarm is unhappy". What I'm wondering about is > whether the feature will be useful to end users with this > pathname length restriction.
Possibly you're getting a little too enthusiastic about these revert requests, because I'd say it's at least a decade too late to get rid of pg_basebackup. As discussed elsewhere, I do rather hope that pg_combinebackup will eventually know how to operate on tar files as well, but right now it doesn't. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com