On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:52 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:36 PM Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I didn't spend much time digging into it, but I wonder if this Assert is
> > sensible.  I noticed that before commit 5bf748b86b, the two datatypes
> > were not equal to each other either (anyrange vs. int4range).
>
> The assertion is wrong. It is testing behavior that's much older than
> commit 5bf748b86b, though. We can just get rid of it, since all of the
> information that we'll actually apply when preprocessing scan keys
> comes from the operator class.
>
> Pushed a fix removing the assertion just now. Thanks for the report.


That's so quick.  Thank you for the prompt fix.

Thanks
Richard

Reply via email to