On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 09:03:56AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > +1. Could there be an argument in favor of a backpatch? This is a > performance improvement, but one could also side that the addition of > sync support in pg_dump[all] has made that a regression that we'd > better fix because the flushes don't matter in this context. They > also bring costs for no gain.
I don't see a strong need to back-patch this, if for no other reason than it seems to have gone unnoticed for 7 major versions. Plus, based on my admittedly limited testing, this is unlikely to provide significant improvements. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
