On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 17:30, Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > On Aug 18, 2018, at 5:26 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Saturday, August 18, 2018, Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> > wrote: >> >> It’s cosmetic, but it’s a cosmetic bug: it incorrectly tells the user >> that they >> must be the owner of the “relational” when in reality it’s the >> materialized view. >> > > Materialized views are a type of relation so it is not wrong, just one of > many instances where we generalize to "relation" based in implementation > details ins team of being explicit about which type of relation is being > affected. > > So why bother having the error message in the code at all then ? Clearly it was the intent of the author to use this language, unfortunately there was no test to prove that it works. This is a simple fix why push back ? Additionally it clarifies exactly what the problem is for the user as Jonathan points out. Dave
