Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> I noticed that postgres.h is included from relcache.h (starting in [1]) and
> wanted to fix that - it violates our usual policy against including postgres.h
> from within headers.
Ugh, yeah, that's entirely against policy.
As for the fix ... what in the world is pg_upgrade doing including
relcache.h? It seems like there's a more fundamental problem here:
either relcache.h is declaring something that needs to be elsewhere,
or pg_upgrade is doing something it should not.
> I was also wondering if we should put something in c.h and postgres.h to avoid
> redundant includes?
No. If anything, I'd want to throw an error for "redundant" includes
of these files, because it's a pretty good red flag about
poorly-thought-out header modularization.
regards, tom lane
