On 09/02/2014 06:27 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <a...@nosys.es> > wrote: >> We are definitely worse. This is the problem, we only look to our own >> belly bottom (if this expression exists in English). All NoSQL scale >> *easily*, *transparently* beyond one node. Postgres doesn't. I'm not saying >> they don't suck at many many other things, or that some of them may be worse >> solution than the problem. But despite JSON/JSONB in pg is awesome, it's far >> far away from what we need to compete agains NoSQL in these regards. > So the discussion started out with a desire to improve PL/pgSQL. Now > somehow NoSQL and JSON is discussed in the same thread. Interesting. > Godwin's Law never fails :-) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Not to mention completely unsubstantiated claims about *all* NoSQL scaling *easily* and *transparently* beyond one node :)
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
