On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > Identification of unjoined tables should be very useful - but it is far > to > > original proposal - so it can be solved separately. > > > > This patch is simple - and usually we prefer more simple patches than one > > bigger. > > > > Better to enhance this feature step by step. > > Agreed -- IMO this is a reasonable first step, except that I would > rename the proposed extension so that it doesn't focus solely on the > first step. I'd pick a name that suggests that various kinds of checks > are applied to queries, so "require_where" would be only one of various > options that can be enabled. > A general SQL-Critic would be a very welcome extension.
