On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Jacob Champion <pchamp...@pivotal.io> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It seems to me that 0001 is good for a committer lookup, that will get >> rid of all existing bugs. For 0002, what you are proposing is still >> not a good idea for anything using page copies. > > I think there is still significant confusion here. To be clear: this > patch is intended to add no changes for local page copies.
Maybe a better way to put this is: we see no failures with the pageinspect regression tests, which exercise PageGetLSN() via the page_header() function. Are there other tests we should be paying attention to that might show a problem with our local-copy logic? --Jacob -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
