Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the sort used to select the records sorts on both the distinct
> expressions and the order by expressions you will get a sensible
> deterministic result.

Sensible in what sense?  ;-)

It seems to me that the existing documentation defines the behavior of
DISTINCT ON as selecting the row within each DISTINCT ON group that is
first according to the ORDER BY columns that are less significant than
the DISTINCT ON keys.  Perhaps this is not clear enough and should be
clarified.  But it doesn't seem very useful to me to extend the behavior
to allow other cases ... what are you really buying if you do so, and
what will it cost in execution time?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to