Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It might be a good idea to rename BM_FREE to something else, perhaps
>> BM_UNPINNED, since I can recall being confused about what it meant
>> too.

> If all it indicates is refcount == 0, ISTM we can just get rid of it
> altogether, and just check the shared refcount directly.

Good point.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to