Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm assuming that the original author of the GEQO code already did
> that testing ...

Removing the code without bothering to verify this assumption is a
little unwise, IMHO: given the low quality of the rest of the GEQO
code, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the present default is not
optimal in some or all circumstances.

-Neil


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to