On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ISTM that we would get the effect your looking for by just moving the > > xl_tot_len field to the end, and only storing it for records with backup > > blocks: > > I like that formulation better --- seems like less > change-for-the-sake-of-change.
Will do. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
