Thanks for the reply!! Having some issues due to nulls…. Any other thoughts?
i=# ALTER TABLE granule_file ADD PRIMARY KEY (granule_uuid, file_id);
ERROR: column "granule_uuid" contains null values
From: Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.math...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 11:36 AM
To: "Wilson, Maria Louise (LARC-E301)[RSES]" <m.l.wil...@nasa.gov>
Cc: Frits Hoogland <frits.hoogl...@gmail.com>,
"pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org"
<pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Need help with performance tuning pg12 on linux
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA. Please take care when
clicking links or opening attachments. Use the "Report Message" button to
report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC.
-> Hash Join (cost=644250.54..10734700.30 rows=22333224
width=223) (actual time=7864.023..44546.392 rows=22325462 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (file_1.id<http://file_1.id/> =
granule_file_1.file_id)
Buffers: shared hit=780882 read=8345236
-> Seq Scan on file file_1 (cost=0.00..9205050.88
rows=22068888 width=207) (actual time=402.706..25222.525 rows=22057988 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=639126 read=8345236
-> Hash (cost=365085.24..365085.24 rows=22333224
width=20) (actual time=7288.228..7288.235 rows=22325462 loops=1)
Buckets: 33554432 Batches: 1 Memory Usage:
1391822kB
Buffers: shared hit=141753
-> Seq Scan on granule_file granule_file_1
(cost=0.00..365085.24 rows=22333224 width=20) (actual time=0.030..2151.380
rows=22325462 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=141753
This part above is the most expensive so far, and taking a look at your
`granule_file` table on the first message, it has no indexes nor constraints,
which certainly looks like a mistake. I'd start optimizing this, you could add
an index on it, but seems that you need a primary key on both columns of this
(junction?) table:
ALTER TABLE granule_file ADD PRIMARY KEY (granule_uuid, file_id);
There are certainly more things to optimize on this query, but I prefer doing
one thing at a time. Could you try with the PK and send the EXPLAIN ANALYZE of
the query again after that?
Best regards,
Matheus de Oliveira
