"Mattias Thorslund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (On the subject of templating engines, again.) > > I wonder what you folks think of the following: > http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/template_engines/
hi! It is nicely written, but actually, I think completely oposite from you. The way I see it, the statement that "template system purpose is to separate bussines logic from presentation", is the biggest missconception about templates :) Not that I think that bussines logic should not be separated from presentation logic, it is only that I think that it shold be separated in your php code design, l, not by the template system. And html, and code should be separated, one is used to model static and visual concepts, and another to model dynamic concepts. And they usually get defined by people with completely different skills and even mindsets. Anyway, I do not think there is "One Right Way", of looking at templates. I for one would never be satsfied with "fat" temlates like they are in Smarty for example. But on the other hand I understand that there are people that would never trade their Smarty templates. So as we do not get to exclusive about how thing must be done, we could get along nicely :) rush -- http://www.templatetamer.com/ http://www.folderscavenger.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
