The pages are all delivered by one single kind of page parser. Its consisting of round about 5 lines of code. But for different reasons there have to get written parsers, especially for the content to show. The longest parser is consisting of 11 lines of code.
But I don't want to say more, otherwise my invention is not mine anymore. Me alone as a developer can't react fast enough, to ar- chive the success, I normaly ought to have, before everybody is running to archive the same innovations like me. But as I can see how you are reacting on it, and others as well everybody is really loves the behavior. Its long time ago that I spoke with other devs. So I really feel well about the conver- sation. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Sascha Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Stut: > Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote: > > hi stut, > > > > thank you for your advices. > > Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still, > since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to > enjoy myself... > > > - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions > > in forms and other page elements which remain static in one > > language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they' > > re coresponding translations as the user selects a different > > language. > > Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave > the text on the page a name, how twee. > > > - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's > > like ?param1=XYZ¶m2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING'] > > are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid > > content links. > > Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards > compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with > are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation. > > > But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my > > system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used > > for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on. > > Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker > and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker. > > > If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you > > will not find any weakness in my application anymore. > > > > Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have > > to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my- > > sql are removing useless keywords and so on. > > Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation. > You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a > lot like a CMS and not a framework. > > > - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide > > with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality > > which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte- > > resting for the viewers on a page. > > Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even > slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using > some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous > patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly. > > > Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts > > of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi- > > ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system > > during the runtime of the application. > > Sold!! > > > I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004. > > I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out, > > that my application framework is the perfect psynet application > > for performing psychological operations over the internet. > > > > I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available > > now a days. > > I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how > ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope. > > > - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain > > a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well > > as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog. > > Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is > derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting > primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological > order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for > specific page elements to be present. > > > - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping > > actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip- > > tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me- > > dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images > > as what ever you could think of. > > Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your > website, whatever will you geniuses think of next. > > > And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link > > to a document, you are able to select the target document from one > > of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target > > document is used as link description and as well the link is shown > > as a nonquery url, like: > > > > http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/something-new/while-i-wrote-it-here.html > > Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not > really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion. > > > Done without mod_rewrite. > > Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is > this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be > interested to know which you are using and what you have against > mod_rewrite. > > > I hope I answered all your questions. > > That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort. > > > Best Regards, > > Yours sarcastically, > > -Stut > > > Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut: > >> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list... > >> > >> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is > >> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line > >> 3) Make sure it's in English > >> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one > >> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care! > >> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the > >> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works, > >> especially when it says it's powered by your product! > >> > >> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful... > >> > >> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories? > >> * What the heck are "Screentexts"? > >> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding > >> URLs. Do you have a reference? > >> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to > >> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because > >> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you > >> could well be! > >> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please. > >> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of > >> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs? > >> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim? > >> > >> -Stut > >> > > > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
