On May 2, 2014 5:33:16 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >On 02.05.2014 23:14, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Friday, May 02, 2014 23:10:02 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> More or less related to this, I found on [1]: >>> W implicit-declaration others.c:301 >>> >>> This can be trivially fixed by including the correct header >>> (libxml/parser.h), see attached patch. >>> Now I'm unsure as to where to push this change? >>> To the unstable branch as 0009-*.patch, thus using the same number >as >>> for the LLVM patch, or to the aca_llvm branch as 0010-*.patch? >>> I would tend to the latter and then both can be uploaded to >experimental >>> together. >> >> The latter is fine, we just need to remember to grab it for an >unstable upload >> if we do it before the LLVM situation is finalized. Also, please >file a bug and >> send the change upstream if you haven't. > >OK, so I've pushed this now to aca_llvm and reported it upstream [1]. >Upstream already scheduled it for 0.98.3. >The LLVM patch is also scheduled for 0.98.3, "if we have time. If not, >will change for subsequent release." > >When do you plan to upload to experimental?
Hopefully tomorrow. Possible tonight. Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list Pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel