On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:00:21PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Andreas,
> >> cid #11125/#11126 > > > >those two are not bug ids but someting from an auto-testing tool. It > >does not make sense. > > These are coverity IDs, but it's not obvious what they are about. > If upstream also doesn't understand it, it should be fine to ignore them. Right, covertity that was. > >I defined four symbols optional which are only exported on 32bit > >architectures. The longterm plan to fix this properly is to wait for > >dpkg 1.18 which defines the tag arch-bits= or to ask upstream those > >symbols are worth exporting or should remain for internal usage. I tend > >to the later. > > As long as nothing uses these symbols, it doesn't matter much. I added a symbol file to linking. I removed the "combo" symbols from beeing exported since it is enough to use them internally. I pushed this to upstream and I am waiting for response. But since those functions are the unrolled versions of the "base" function I don't see any reason to export them. > I pushed a patch, which allows building clamav against the system > tomsfastmath library, if it is detected and otherwise uses the embedded > copy. > With the current libtfm it seems to work fine, so once it is in the archive, > we can just replace the (useless) libtommath-dev dependency with libtfm-dev. Hehe. Right. > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list Pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel