On 23/12/2007, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > There's gdc-4.2 in experimental. I guess we will hit this same problem > whenever it migrates to unstable and testing ? I guess the best option > is for gdc-X to provide gdc ?
AFAICT, that is (or was) due to gcc-defaults's maintainer not including Arthur's patch so that gdc points to the right location. I seem to recall it broke (or was breaking) more or less all D-related packages. Looks like: | gcc-defaults (1.62) unstable; urgency=low | * Add gdc, make gdc-4.1 the default (Arthur Loiret). Closes: #456596. I'd say just depend on gdc unless you need features from a specific gdc version. You don't specify any version on gcc or g++, and let build-essential (that is: gcc and g++) let the job for you. Looks to me that doing the same for gdc makes sense. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpMjIwfdEyzX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-games-devel mailing list Pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel
