Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:00:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462331: FTBFS: glib2.0_2.15.3-1(hppa/experimental)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: glib2.0
Version: 2.15.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of glib2.0_2.15.3-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
> Build started at 20080123-0216
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: autotools-dev, debhelper (>> 5.0.22), dpkg-dev (>= 1.14.13),
> gettext, gnome-pkg-tools (>= 0.11), gtk-doc-tools, libfam-dev | libgamin-dev,
> libpcre3-dev (>= 7.4-1), libselinux1-dev | not+linux-gnu, linux-libc-dev |
> not+linux-gnu, pkg-config (>= 0.14.0), quilt
[...]
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I../.. -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gio/inotify -pthread
> -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"GLib-GIO\" -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3
> -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/glib -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gmodule
> -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gio -I../../gio -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG
> -DGIO_MODULE_DIR=\"/usr/lib/gio/modules\" -DGIO_COMPILATION
> -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -Wall -g -O2 -MT libinotify_la-inotify-helper.lo -MD
> -MP -MF .deps/libinotify_la-inotify-helper.Tpo -c -o
> libinotify_la-inotify-helper.lo `test -f 'inotify-helper.c' || echo
> '/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gio/inotify/'`inotify-helper.c
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gio/inotify
> "" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"GLib-GIO\" -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3
> -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/glib -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gmodule
> -I/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gio -I../../gio -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG
> -DGIO_MODULE_DIR=\"/usr/lib/gio/modules\" -DGIO_COMPILATION
> -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -Wall -g -O2 -MT libinotify_la-inotify-helper.lo -MD
> -MP -MF .deps/libinotify_la-inotify-helper.Tpo -c
> /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/gio/inotify/inotify-helper.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
> .libs/libinotify_la-inotify-helper.o
> gcc: : No such file or directory
> make[5]: *** [libinotify_la-inotify-helper.lo] Error 1
> make[5]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/debian/build/deb/gio/inotify'
> make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/debian/build/deb/gio'
> make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/debian/build/deb/gio'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/debian/build/deb'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glib2.0-2.15.3/debian/build/deb'
> make: *** [debian/stampdir/build-stamp-deb] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
A full build log can be found at:
http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=glib2.0&ver=2.15.3-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am Donnerstag, den 24.01.2008, 15:59 +0100 schrieb Loïc Minier:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > This looks more like a libtool bug to me. For some reason libtool
> > converts the spaces in it's own commandline into "" for the gcc
> > commandline which lets gcc search for a file with "" as name for
> > compilation.
>
> That was my impression as well, but it could also be caused by race
> conditions like libtool checking for something while gcc gets upgraded
> or whatever.
>
> > As this doesn't happen on other architectures it's probably a problem in
> > the buildd chroot? Can you reproduce this build failure?
>
> I've asked zobel for a rebuild on IRC.
Ok, 2.15.4 built fine and nothing in that regard was changed upstream.
Closing this bug...
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list
pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnome-maintainers
