Ok I screwed up, the reason I got different errors in my test chroot was
because I was mistakenly testing with an older version of libcitygml. Of
course I only discovered this when I actually uploaded the hacked-up
package to raspbian and it got rejected as being older than the version
already there.
And strangely 2+3p2p1 built fine in my test chroot despite failling
twice on our autobuilders.
peter green wrote:
libcitygml failed to build on the raspbian autobuilders in the
following way.
dpkg-deb: building package `openscenegraph-plugin-citygml-shared' in
`../openscenegraph-plugin-citygml-shared_0.14+svn134-2+3p2p1_armhf.deb'.
dpkg-deb --build debian/openscenegraph-plugin-citygml-static ..
dpkg-deb: error: parsing file
'debian/openscenegraph-plugin-citygml-static/DEBIAN/control' near line
7 package 'openscenegraph-plugin-citygml-static':
'Depends' field, reference to 'libopenscenegraph-dev': error in
version: version string is empty
dh_builddeb: dpkg-deb --build
debian/openscenegraph-plugin-citygml-static .. returned exit code 2
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
debian/rules:10: recipe for target 'binary-arch' failed
Strangely when I tried to reproduce it manually in a test chroot it
failed in a different way. It seems that osgPlugins-3.2.1 ended up in
debian/tmp/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf rather than debian/tmp/usr/lib
. I added a hack to debian/rules to move it back to the place the
packaging expected it.
I then ran into an error about an invalid number from
debian/gencontrol. Further investigation showed that it couldn't cope
with dpkg --get-selections returning libopenscenegraph100:armhf. Again
a quick hack was added.
I have not tested this in debian but I don't think we have changed
anything relavent to this in raspbian so I doubt the undelying issues
are raspbian specific.
I strongly suspect this is related to the recent multiarching of
openscenegraph.
A very hacky patch I whipped up to get a transition to go through in
raspbian is attatched, the patch is definately not suitable for
inclusion in debian in it's current form but I included it to give
indications of what places need attention.
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
