Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-6.1 Severity: normal
Wouldn't your package from Dec 2008 far better than the current "solution". I think so. So, please, upload at least that one to experimental. (You're right, distributions cannot have feelings. But it is still a shame for debian.) BTW: One thing I don't get is, why that package has that complecity. The only reason in mind is, that it won't work "out of box" with a free java compiler. If thats the problem, common, move it to non-free. Most users won't care. The ones that care can stick to the two years (!) old version. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages eclipse depends on: ii eclipse-jdt 3.2.2-6.1 Java Development Tools plug-ins fo ii eclipse-pde 3.2.2-6.1 Plug-in Development Environment to ii eclipse-source 3.2.2-6.1 Eclipse source code plug-ins ii libc6 2.9-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.1-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.16.1-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii zenity 2.24.1-1 Display graphical dialog boxes fro Versions of packages eclipse recommends: pn eclipse-gcj <none> (no description available) eclipse suggests no packages. -- no debconf information _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers