-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 tag 588943 + patch thanks
On 2010-10-09 18:26, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote: > So, I guess we should stick with the second patch I proposed and not the > last one. Is the patch correct? Does it need more work? > > > > Hi Sorry for the delay; your second patch looks much better as far as I can tell with a quick look. I will apply it soon (hopefully tomorrow); if you have not heard from me before Wednesday, please ping me directly! ~Niels -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkywnMQACgkQVCqoiq1YlqxbEgCeJSoeHc0L2TssZP/afruqqEp1 rycAoJer0ISe/9qF+bo0mF/f3CMcefx7 =wfGG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.