Am 28.03.2018 um 15:13 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > Control: reopen -1 > >> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:19:30 +0200 >> From: Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> >> To: 893382-d...@bugs.debian.org >> Subject: Re: osgi-foundation-ee FTBFS with openjdk-9 >> >> Building the package works for me. I'm going to upload a new revision >> but I think this bug is already resolved. > > Still happens for me, and also on the buildd: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=osgi-foundation-ee&arch=all&ver=4.2.0-3&stamp=1522242580&raw=0
Right. Apparently one of my chroots was not properly updated. This issue is related to openjdk-9 bug https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8186841 However they only consider the error handling of javadoc a bug (not exiting gracefully), the "bad class file" is another story. AFAICS osgi-foundation-ee uses identical class names and the same namespace as several classes in the java.base module (src/java/util) and OpenJDK 9 does not like that. Maybe --add-modules java.base might work in this case? We could also do the following. The only reverse-dependency of this package is osgi-compendium. It appears it requires only some specific class files to build correctly (namely javax.microedition.io.*" If this is true we could move those classes into osgi-compendium and remove osgi-foundation-ee from Debian. One package less to support.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
