Your message dated Mon, 9 Apr 2018 21:51:13 +0200
with message-id <ef4c7e1b-6de7-741e-6875-13d899742...@debian.org>
and subject line fixed in 3.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #893388,
regarding "Unable to find javadoc command:" on openjdk-10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
893388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libmaven-javadoc-plugin
Version: 3.0.0-2
Priority: normal
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java10
Tags: buster sid

On OpenJDK 10, the plugin fails to find the javadoc command, and prints:

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
  org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.0:jar (default-cli)
  on [..]:
MavenReportException: Error while generating Javadoc:
  Unable to find javadoc command:
    The environment variable JAVA_HOME is not correctly set. -> [Help 1]

Please ensure that it can find the javadoc command, at least during
Debian package builds.


This issue is the same bug as https://bugs.debian.org/866929 but for a
different JDK release.

The patch for that issue,
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/maven-javadoc-plugin.git/tree/debian/patches/openjdk-9-javadoc-path.patch
, is using "is exactly JDK9", and apparently needs to be "is at least JDK9".


Cheers,
Chris.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.0-4

--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to