Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > > Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but > > this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides > > libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in > > soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? > > The changelog in > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html > > says: > > * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to > libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. > - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore. > - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as > mentioned > in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004. > > So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust > ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of > this if agreed upon.
It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev exist? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
