On 2015-08-06 12:08:44, Tobias Frost wrote: > Source: libffado > Followup-For: Bug #794701 > > Hi Sebastian, > > Well, techhnically this bug is still unsresolved, so I wondering why you are > closing it. > More accurate would be to reassign it then to libxml++ and glibmm2.4 (I will > do so afterwards) > > However, can you advice the transistion bug for libxml++. I could not find it. > > libxml++ also does not have any bug recorded, so the maintainer might not > even be aware that > there is some action required.
I've closed the bug due to the recent d-d-annouce mail asking to not file bugs for these kind of linker failures. Instead it should be checked whether transition bugs for the libraries exists and file bugs against them. If there is no transition bug for libxml++, please file one. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
