On 10 May 2016 at 17:05, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >> On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >>>> On 4 May 2016 at 11:57, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> 2016-04-26 19:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >>>>>> On 25 April 2016 at 18:12, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On 20 March 2016 at 12:52, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's a new release of SuperCollider out (3.7) and I've imported and >>>>>>>> updated the packaging at pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git . It builds >>>>>>>> and works for me (on x64), and I'd like to ask others to have a look >>>>>>>> at it and consider testing/uploading it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I reproduce the same failure as Hanno, also on x64: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /usr/bin/ld: ../../external_libraries/libtlsf.a(tlsf.c.o): relocation >>>>>>> R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared >>>>>>> object; recompile with -fPIC >>>>>>> ../../external_libraries/libtlsf.a: error adding symbols: Bad value >>>>>>> >>>>>>> adding said -fPIC flag to tlsf target continues until: >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lQt5::OpenGL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you have a look? >>>>>> >>>>>> This seems to be a missing build-dep on libqt5opengl5-dev. It builds >>>>>> fine after that. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW, why do we disable the testsuite? >>>>> >>>>> (Sorry for the delay - didn't spot your second message) >>>>> >>>>> Regarding the testsuite: IIRC it doesn't succeed on all archs, and >>>>> that's beyond our control. In 2013 you asked the same question, you >>>>> asked "Why disable the testsuite? After all, if it is failing, its for >>>>> a reason...." and my answer was the following: >>>>> >>>>>> That's what I thought too at first. However it's not intended to be >>>>>> packaged (it doesn't build anything), and after discussion with the >>>>>> developer who actually made and maintains that testsuite, he wanted it >>>>>> that way... (It's not really a testsuite of supercollider, btw, I >>>>>> think covers the 'supernova' component.) >>>> >>>> Heh, sorry for forgetting about that. I added a comment to that effect >>>> to debian/rules. >>> >>> Thanks. Also thanks for the suggested build fixes. Now I've upgraded >>> my OS I can finally confirm them, so I've pushed them (and proposed >>> them upstream too). >> >> So now we have several build failures: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=supercollider >> >> All of them in the embedded oscpack, but not all of them the same. I >> was going to suggest using the available library, but it is orphaned. >> Anyone up to take the maintainance of oscpack? > > One thing to note: it's only "supernova" that makes use of oscpack, > and supernova is optional since it's a drop-in replacement for > "scsynth". > So, one cop-out alternative available to us (if oscpack isn't getting > fixed) is that on some platforms we could disable building it > (-DSUPERNOVA=0) and disable packaging it.
We are already doing that[1], so that is a possible course of action. BTW, is it possible to use a system oscpack? It looks like the library is barely ever updated, so maybe I could just bite the bullet and upload it. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git/tree/debian/rules#n25 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers