On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:08:17 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> Quoting Felipe Sateler (2017-10-04 00:32:21)
> >
> > I think your patch mainly addresses issue number 2, doesn't it? Fixing 
> > issue 1 would require asking upstream to provide 
> > https://mirrors.kodi.tv/addons/krypton/addons.xml.gz.md5 (and upgrade 
> > to a better hash algorithm).
> 
> Uhm, my patch is the very window to not requiring upstream to solve the 
> security issue: 

are you sure you wanted to say this?

for me it kind of implies that:
- either all users of kodi use it only through the packages provided
(and patched) by Debian.
- or any other users are not affected by the security concerns of using
http:// (e.g because only the http-implementation provided by Debian is
susceptible to mitm-attacks)
- or all non-Debian users simply don't deserve a solution for that
security fix.

i cannot agree with any of these points, and i do think that any bug
with severity "grave" that is not specific to Debian should be forwarded
to upstream to be solved there (well, actually *any* bug that is non
Debian-sepcific, not just the grave ones) .

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to