On 01/28/2018 06:17 PM, James Cowgill wrote: >>> # Incorrect Package Naming >>> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so >>> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they >>> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have >>> the correct name - ie should "pd-lua" become "pd/lua" or "pd/pd-lua"? >> Please, let's keep repo name = source package name. So the package >> 'pd-lua' should have a repo 'pd-lua', wherever group it is in. > I think so, but I'll wait to see what umlaeute says because he pretty > much owns all the pd-* packages.
oh totally: the repository should always match the package name, so that would be https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-lua gfsamrd IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
