Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14/07/2008): > Oh, and it looks like I noticed the pending NMU a single minute too > late, so I'm going to merge its contents into the unstable branch, and > rebase my svn-snapshot branch on top of the unstable branch.
Done, all of the .2, .3, .4 NMUs have their changelog entries merged, as well as the non debian/-ish contents stored as debian/patches/extra.diff I've then rebased svn-snapshot on top of unstable as unstable, and trashed both experimental (which was only a branch used before I switched to svn-snapshot) and svn-snapshot branches, since there are no use keeping at all. I didn't think about the problem of possible NMUs when we're working on such branches, and I should have made it clear that it could be rebased if needed. I believe using the usual convention of the pu/* namespace for such branches would make sense, so that people know that they can be rebased (pu meaning proposed-updates). > So, yes, the source package available at [1] isn't the very definitive > one, but it looks be from a functional point of view very similar to > what is going to be uploaded, probably tomorrow (monday). I know > people are quite busy at times, so I'm thinking about uploading ASAP > so that we can also benefit from user testing. > > [1] http://people.debian.org/~kibi/packages/ The current one might be the final one from my point of view, building looks fine (cowbuilders for i386 and amd64 are running), and binaries will be uploaded there as well. (A tweak to turn cmake coloured output might be needed, I'm checking that.) Reports from upgrade paths from current sid binaries to these ones are welcome as well. If I don't get any, I'll try and make sure myself, but the more testers, the better. ;-) Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel