On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:45:36 -0500 "Steve M. Robbins" <st...@sumost.ca> wrote: > On June 26, 2016 02:12:06 PM Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > I tried to stop packaging these scripts months > > ago. But maybe KDE team only was aware about > > that. I am sorry. Digikam uses pkg-config and > > libgphoto2 has a .pc file for long time. > > OK, that's great! I'm packaging a new upstream digikam and it fails to > detect > libgphoto2 out of the box, because it is looking for gphoto2-config. > > I'll look into fixing digikam to use the pkg-config instead. > > > If you need the old-style-config-script and has to > > use the old path, I can manage it for you. > > No, that's not necessary. >
Ok. But feel free to send an email again. For a while, the bug still open. Nice to talk with you. regards,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
