Your message dated Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:48:35 +0200
with message-id <20170626184835.gk13...@riseup.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#852707: schleuder: FTBFS : refresh_keys test suite 
fails
has caused the Debian Bug report #852707,
regarding schleuder: FTBFS : refresh_keys test suite fails
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
852707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852707
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: schleuder
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: normal

Hi there--

I've just tried to build schleduer 3.0.1-1 from git commit
6216f558d82f5a1038139ec0371916585bd08cfc

and the test suite shows two failures:


-------------
Failures:

  1) cli #refresh_keys reports errors from refreshing keys
     Failure/Error: expect(Mail::TestMailer.deliveries.length).to eq 1

       expected: 1
            got: 0

       (compared using ==)
     # ./spec/schleuder/integration/cli_spec.rb:117:in `block (3 levels) in 
<top (required)>'
     # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:28:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:27:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

  2) cli #refresh_keys updates one key from the keyserver
     Failure/Error: expect(Mail::TestMailer.deliveries.length).to eq 1

       expected: 1
            got: 0

       (compared using ==)
     # ./spec/schleuder/integration/cli_spec.rb:102:in `block (3 levels) in 
<top (required)>'
     # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:28:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:27:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

Finished in 1 minute 33.09 seconds (files took 1.06 seconds to load)
157 examples, 2 failures

Failed examples:

rspec ./spec/schleuder/integration/cli_spec.rb:109 # cli #refresh_keys reports 
errors from refreshing keys
rspec ./spec/schleuder/integration/cli_spec.rb:92 # cli #refresh_keys updates 
one key from the keyserver

Randomized with seed 48039
-------------

I think that looks like 3.0.1-1 was uploaded to debian with both
source and binary packages [0], so the buildd's don't have a chance to
build it.  If you do future uploads as source-only builds
("dpkg-buildpackage -S" or "gbp buildpackage -S") then that gives the
buildds a chance to build cleanly and run the test suites.

I note that having a test suite contact the network (as the two
failing tests appear to want to do) is also probably not a great idea.
It means that the test suite will fail on a build daemon that doesn't
have network access, and also that it may intermittently fail based on
whether the remote network service is available.

Thanks for your work packaging schleuder for debian!

       --dkg

[0] see the .deb in 
https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/schleuder/news/20170126T152017Z.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 
'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 852707 3.1.0-1
thanks

Hi dkg,

On 17-06-15 23:23:40, schleu...@nadir.org wrote:
> From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@debian.org>

> >> Could you confirm that changing the port make the tests work for
> >> you?
> >
> > Ping?
> 
> apologies, this message was addressed to the bug and not to me
> directly and i'm just seeing it now (i had not subscribed to the bug
> report itself).

No need to say sorry, I should have done better.

> if i disabled sks on the building host, i was able to complete the
> build, so in that sense i "changed the port" and it built fine.
> 
> > Also: Are you using pbuilder with USENETWORK=no, the default, by any chance?
> 
> on a dedicated builder host without sks installed, pbuilder with
> USENETWORK=no worked out fine. :)

Great! The port was changed upstream in 3.0.3, thus closing this bug and
marking as done.

Cheers,
Georg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

Reply via email to