Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:34:01 +0200
with message-id <20170708193401.om6iklu6vqlib...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #867647,
regarding ruby-rest-client: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed: Failure/Error:
return http.request(req, body, &block)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
867647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rest-client
Version: 1.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: return http.request(req, body, &block)
>
> WebMock::NetConnectNotAllowedError:
> Real HTTP connections are disabled. Unregistered request: GET
> http://some/resource with headers {'Accept'=>'application/json',
> 'Accept-Encoding'=>'gzip, deflate', 'Authorization'=>'Basic Zm9vOmJhcg==',
> 'User-Agent'=>'Ruby'}
>
> You can stub this request with the following snippet:
>
> stub_request(:get, "http://some/resource";).
> with(headers: {'Accept'=>'application/json',
> 'Accept-Encoding'=>'gzip, deflate', 'Authorization'=>'Basic Zm9vOmJhcg==',
> 'User-Agent'=>'Ruby'}).
> to_return(status: 200, body: "", headers: {})
>
> registered request stubs:
>
> stub_request(:get, "http://foo:bar@new/resource";).
> with(headers: {'Accept'=>'application/json'})
> stub_request(:get, "http://foo:bar@some/resource";).
> with(headers: {'Accept'=>'application/json'})
>
> ============================================================
> # ./lib/restclient/request.rb:270:in `net_http_do_request'
> # ./lib/restclient/request.rb:418:in `block in transmit'
> # ./lib/restclient/request.rb:413:in `transmit'
> # ./lib/restclient/request.rb:176:in `execute'
> # ./lib/restclient/request.rb:41:in `execute'
> # ./spec/unit/response_spec.rb:90:in `block (3 levels) in <top
> (required)>'
>
> Finished in 0.26307 seconds (files took 0.67677 seconds to load)
> 217 examples, 1 failure
>
> Failed examples:
>
> rspec ./spec/unit/response_spec.rb:87 # RestClient::Response redirection
> follows a redirection and keep the parameters
>
> Randomized with seed 14583
>
> /usr/bin/ruby2.3 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format
> documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed:
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/07/07/ruby-rest-client_1.8.0-3_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.2-1
this is fixed in that new version
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
