Hi Michael, On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: > > a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) > b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5) > > Forcing the upgrade of only one of the two will fail.
if this is the case, then I think the packages metadata *must* express this,
probably by depending on the appropriate udev/systemd versions.
you cannot expect users to do the right thing by themselves ;-)
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
