Am 08.03.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Martin Pitt: > Hello, > > Julian Andres Klode [2017-12-05 11:43 +0100]: >> libpam-systemd depending on systemd-shim first causes severe trouble with >> resolving dependencies, as APT picks systemd-shim but then later sees a >> package which needs systemd-sysv and fails. >> >> I understand the order was necessary for preventing upgrades to stretch >> from migrating to systemd, but with the packages now widely installed, >> this should not be a problem anymore, as the dependencies are satisfied >> already, so APT won't switch them. > > With the recent TC decision [1] I think we should actually be good now to flip > this around in unstable/testing. Michael, do you have any reservation there?
There is one case: someone installs a minimal system without libpam-systemd, then switches to sysvinit-core, then installs a desktop environment which pulls libpam-systemd (via polkit in most cases). In that specific scenario, apt will uninstall sysvinit-core and install systemd-sysv again. Is this something the TC has considered and is ok with? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
