DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10976>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10976 [Patch] Unicode Support for sheetname , refactor SSTDeserializer & UnicodeString class ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-30 04:03 ------- Hi Andy, Sergei and all >I have a succes and wrote it back to you vai e-mail, but juxt forgot, that it >succeded on my changes. %) >And have took a look on my changes. As I see it is a very good idea to put the >code of using in the Records UnicodeString class. Great! can you send me a copy of the final code that works for you. >Let's merge our work on the unicode getting and putting we have into the >UnicodeString. Sure. Let fix this bug together. I have some planning on futher refactor/complete the UnicodeString class. Lets collaborate on this issue. >Could you see at the code at BoundSheetRecord, when I have refined you step: >using only StringUtil without SSTSerializer? Please check http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10976 for [Patch] Unicode Support for sheetname , refactor SSTDeserializer & UnicodeString class as it refactor code regarding BIFF8 format from SSTDeserializer to UnicodeString class. What do you think of this idea. >What do you think about putting it into the UnicodeSrting, so we can benefit on >using this class and instantiating it in any record we need Unicode? Do you mean code described in? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=2422 I am really interesting in working on this together. Thanks Patrick Lee -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
