On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 11:07:56AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Chris Waddey wrote: > > Hello. > > Hi, > > > I was able to get the latest version of sway working on my box after > > getting the latest version of wlroots to work, which was after applying > > the following patch to the latest version of libdrm (source obtained > > from https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm.git). I don't know if we > > have some patches somewhere else that handle this, but I figured I > > would send it your way in case it would save some effort. > > Does this include the removal of the wlr_drm protocol which was > committed to sway/wlroots a few hours ago ? > > I wasn't sure if OpenBSD libdrm / mesa supports linux-dmabuf which is > supposed to replace it. > > If it works with linux-dmabuf, that's great news. I don't think there > are any other significant changes since the released versions packaged > in ports that could impact OpenBSD. > > > I also had to do > > > > doas chmod $USER:$USER /dev/dri/* && env WLR_RENDERER=pixman > > startsway.sh > > Normally if you log in on the text console where you want to run sway, > the /dev/dri/* owndership is taken care of by fbtab(5). > > I think setting WLR_RENDERER to pixman means that you don't use the > new linux-dmabuf protocol. What happens if you leave that variable > undefined (defaults to 'auto') ? > > > to get everything just right. And of course I applied the patches I > > found in ports to sway and wlroots, but nothing else that I can > > think of. > > This diff is present in the /usr/xenocara/lib/libdrm tree. (not > exactly the same though: the whole #ifdef __OpenBSD__ part can be > removed now).
attempts to merge the patches upstream stalled years ago https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/merge_requests/119
