https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=15
I get your point but this is for a different blocking list. That is spamcop and spamassassin have different blocking lists. What I really need is a way to make the rbl_override work for the domain name that has been related. I am going to review my logs and see how much spam spamcop stops that isn't coming from Microsoft. Maybe I could whitelist the Microsoft IP space in rbl_override. Feb 24, 2024 6:15:10 AM Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org>: > lists--- via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-02-24 09:49: > >> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_checks, >> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_checks, >> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_override, >> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, >> check_policy_service unix:private/policy > > https://hetrixtools.com/blacklist-check/40.107.93.98 > > not listed, suggest dnswl in postfix, google it :) > > other then that don't use hash for ip checks > > cidr is more perfect for this > > on the other side https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/40.107.93.98.html > > https://dnswl.org/s/?s=1357 > > _______________________________________________ > Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org > To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
