DigiCert votes “yes”

 

From: Public <public-boun...@cabforum.org <mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org> 
> on behalf of Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.org 
<mailto:public@cabforum.org> >
Reply-To: Kirk Hall <kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com 
<mailto:kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com> >, CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion 
List <public@cabforum.org <mailto:public@cabforum.org> >
Date: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 3:23 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org 
<mailto:public@cabforum.org> >
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 190

 

Voting has started on Ballot 190 as proposed on Sept 5 (see bottom of this 
message, and attachments), as amended by my email from Sept. 11 (see 
immediately below).  Voting runs through Sept. 19 at 18:00 UTC.

 

Entrust votes yes.

 

From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via 
Public
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:01 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org 
<mailto:public@cabforum.org> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Two amendments to Ballot 190

 

The proposer and endorsers are making two minor amendments to Ballot 190 as 
follows.

 

1) In BR 3.2.2.4.6 "Agreed-Upon Change to Website", the current draft Version 8 
still has the typo "Request Value" that crept in sometime around BR 1.4. It 
should be "Random Value".  Accordingly, BR 3.2.2.4.6 in Ballot 190 is changed 
to read as follows:

 

3.2.2.4.6 Agreed-Upon Change to Website

 

Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming one of the 
following under the "/.well-known/pki-validation" directory, or another path 
registered with IANA for the purpose of Domain Validation, on the Authorization 
Domain Name that is accessible by the CA via HTTP/HTTPS over an Authorized Port:

 

1.       The presence of Required Website Content contained in the content of a 
file. The entire Required Website Content MUST NOT appear in the request used 
to retrieve the file or web page, or

 

2.       The presence of the Request Token or Request Random Value contained in 
the content of a file where the Request Token or Random Value MUST NOT appear 
in the request. ***

 

2) In Version 8 of BR 3.2.2.4.7, "DNS Change", the current language says:

 

"Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming the presence of 
a Random Value or Request Token for either in a DNS CNAME, TXT or CAA record 
for either 1) an Authorization Domain Name; or 2) an Authorization Domain Name 
that is prefixed with a label that begins with an underscore character."  

 

Note that "for either" appears twice in the sentence, and we think the first 
occurrence should be deleted.  Accordingly, BR 3.2.2.4.7 in Ballot 190 is 
changed to read as follows:

 

3.2.2.4.7  DNS Change

Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming the presence of 
a Random Value or Request Token for either in a DNS CNAME, TXT or CAA record 
for either 1) an Authorization Domain Name; or 2) an Authorization Domain Name 
that is prefixed with a label that begins with an underscore character.

 

Voting on Ballot 190 will begin tomorrow, and the text has been changed as 
shown above.

***

From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via 
Public
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:52 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org 
<mailto:public@cabforum.org> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 190 - Discussion Period is starting

 

As agreed on our CABF teleconference last week, we are starting the formal 
discussion period for Ballot 190 (in this case, v8).  I have attached the 
ballot in two formats and in three modes.

 

The title of the actual ballot to be voted on uses all capital letters “BALLOT 
190 v8 (9-5-2017)”.  I also attach a version that includes some explanatory 
comments, and a “clean” version showing how the BRs will read if Ballot 190 v8 
is adopted “Ballot 190 v8 (9-5-2017) (showing BRs if adopted)”.

 

The discussion period ends Sept. 12 at 18:00 UTC, and the voting period runs 
Sept. 12-19.

 

This version 8 is based on the prior version 7, but includes a limited number 
of changes as outlined in emails among me, Ryan, and Doug on Aug. 29-30.  

 

We are almost there!  Thanks to everyone who has worked on this effort over the 
past two years.  Assuming Ballot 190 passes, the Validation Working Group can 
then start work on further amendments as outlined in my prior emails.

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to