Thanks for your input, Dimitris. I've amended section 4.d. as proposed - https://github.com/cabforum/forum/commit/c6850e24eb49d5cfcb00eae4d11e82544504bffb Thanks again, Ben
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:03 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) < dzach...@harica.gr> wrote: > > Hello Ben, > > At F2F58 > <https://cabforum.org/2023/03/02/minutes-of-the-f2f-58-meeting-in-ottawa-canada-28-february-1-march-2023/>we > had a discussion about the lessons learned from ballot SC60 > <https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/11-CABF_Lessons-learned-from-SC60.pdf>. > During that meeting, a proposal was made that seems to fix the ambiguity of > the current Bylaws. > > In line 93 of the proposed ballot, it says: > > ***(d)** There is a mandatory six-month probationary period during which > any representative of an Applicant must attend at least 30% of all SCWG > teleconferences (not counting subcommittee meetings) and at least one SCWG > face-to-face meeting (either physically or virtually). After successful > completion of the mandatory probationary period and meeting all > requirements of section 3(a) or 3(b), an Applicant may become a Voting > Member, if the SCWG determines by consensus among the Members during a > Meeting or Teleconference, or upon the request of any Member, by a Ballot > among the Members, that the Applicant meets the requirements of section > 3(a) or 3(b). Acceptance by consensus shall be determined, or a Ballot of > the Members shall be held, as soon as the Applicant indicates that it has > presented all information required and has responded to all follow-up > questions from the SCWG and the Applicant has complied with the > requirements of Section 5.5 of the CA/Browser Forum Bylaws.* > > > Instead of: > > *"or upon the request of any Member, by a Ballot among the Members, by a > Ballot among the Members, that the Applicant meets the requirements of > section 3(a) or 3(b)" * > > please update to: > > *"or upon the request of any Member that challenges the Applicant's > adherence to all of the requirements of section 3(a) or 3(b), by a Ballot > among the Members."* > > I read the rest of the proposed changes and they look good. If you are ok > with the change above, HARICA would be happy to endorse the ballot. > > > Best regards, > Dimitris. > > On 13/10/2023 1:23 π.μ., Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > > All, > > I am planning to introduce a Forum ballot to amend the Server Certificate > Working Group Charter. > > At a high level, here are some of the proposed changes: > > - Section numbering added > - "Root Certificate Issuer" voting category removed > - Membership requirements for Certificate Consumers added > - 6-month probationary period prior to voting membership added > - Voting percentages and quorum clarified > > Because there are numerous proposed changes, here are a diff and a blob > for your review. > > <http://goog_919727606> > > https://github.com/cabforum/forum/compare/59185f16917cc7f5b83564fe5fddff32cf84c8ce...85e569a43a5a2c9e5e16ce8bf1e569a98cfbd720 > > <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/goog_919727603> > > https://github.com/cabforum/forum/blob/BenWilson-SCWG-charter-1.3/SCWG-charter.md > > I look forward to your comments and suggestions. > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing > listPublic@cabforum.orghttps://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
